OASIS: Online Archival Search Information System
|http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HLS.Libr:law00252View HOLLIS Record
Questions or Comments Copyright Statement
On July 16, 2018, OASIS will retire. It will be replaced by HOLLIS for Archival Discovery. Please explore.
© President and Fellows of Harvard College
Location: Harvard Depository
Call No.: 002272564
Repository: Harvard Law School Library, Harvard Library, Harvard University
Creator: Charles River Bridge
Title: Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge records
Quantity: 2 boxes (.6 linear feet)
Language of materials: English
Abstract: Records of the trial between the proprietors of the Charles River Bridge and the proprietors of the Warren Bridge, heard before the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1828. In this famous case, the plaintiff claimed that the Warren Bridge charter impaired the obligation of the state's earlier contract, and was therefore unconstitutional.
Additional material at Harvard University related to this collection:
- Charles RiverBridge, review of case of the free bridge, 1827, Harvard Law SchoolLibrary (Hollis 4383966).
- Charles River Bridge, report ofspecial joint committee, 1835, Harvard Law School Library (Hollis4383962).
- Proprietors of Charles River Bridge, meeting,1785, Networked Resource, (Hollis 12307407).
- Massachusetts Supreme Court, The proprietors of Charles River Bridgevs. the proprietors of the Warren Bridge, 1828, Widener (Hollis4607169).
- Massachusetts General Court, committee report,1827, Widener (Hollis 6028752).
- Simon Greenleaf,materials relating to the Charles River Bridge Case, Harvard LawSchool Library (Hollis 4380334).
- Simon Greenleaf, lettersto his son, Harvard Law School Library (Hollis 9857148).
- Lemuel Shaw, letters, Harvard Law School Library (Hollis2069259 ).
- Roger Taney, papers, Harvard Law School Library (Hollis2212998).
- Roger Taney, John McLean, and Joseph Story,opinions, 1837, Harvard Law School Library (Hollis 4383969, 4388655); Widener (Hollis 7074974).
- John McLean, opinions, 1837,Harvard Law School Library (Hollis 4390871).
- HarvardUniversity Corporation, records relating to Harvard's interest in theCharlstown ferry, Harvard University Archives (Hollis1640514).
- [Joint Standing] Committee on Roads andBridges, report on Warren Bridge, 1833, Harvard Law School (Hollis4383958).
- Osgood Carelton and John Gardener, statementagainst another bridge over Charles River, 1807, Lamont Microfiche;Networked Resource (Hollis 4252979).
- Octavius Pickering,case of the proprietors of Charles River bridge against theproprietors of Warren bridge, 1830, Harvard Law School Library;Houghton (Hollis 4036221).
In 1640, the Massachusetts General Court granted ferry rights between Boston and Charlestown to the recently founded Harvard College. Harvard College operated a ferry on the Charles River until 1785, when a group led by Thomas Russell of Boston petitioned the legislature to charter a bridge over the Charles River. The joint legislature approved the petition on February 25, 1785, and the General Court confirmed the grant on March 9, incorporating Thomas Russell and associates as the "Proprietors of the Charles River Bridge". The proprietors -- including, in addition to Russell, such prominent figures as Nathaniel Gorham,James Swan, and John Hancock -- were to pay Harvard College £200 annually for the duration of the forty year charter, after which the bridge would revert to the state. The Charles River Bridge company enjoyed a monopoly on transportation across the Charles River until 1792, when, despite vigorous protest on the part of the proprietors, the legislature authorized the construction of the West Boston Bridge between Cambridge and western Boston. In a concession to the Charles River Bridge company, whose revenues risked being diminished by the new bridge, the legislature extended the term of the charter from forty to seventy years.The interests of the Charles River Bridge proprietors were even more gravely threatened in 1823, when a group of Charlestown merchants, led by John Skinner and Isaac Warren, presented a petition to the legislature for a charter to build a toll-free bridge over the Charles River. Four years and several bills later, in March 1827, the legislature passed an act to establish the Warren Bridge Corporation. According to the terms of the charter, the bridge would be turned over to the state and become free to the public after the proprietors had recouped the cost of construction. In June of 1828, construction of the Warren Bridge began. On the 28th of the same month, Daniel Webster, Lemuel Shaw, and Benjamin Gorham, acting on behalf of the Charles River Bridge company, filed a bill in equity in the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, claiming the unconstitutionality of the Warren Bridge charter due to its appropriation of private property for public use without compensation, and violation of the implied monopoly granted by the state's earlier contract.After a hearing, the court unanimously rejected the plaintiff's motion for an injunction to stop construction of the new bridge. After further hearings in state court had failed to impede the construction of the Warren Bridge, the Charles River Bridge proprietors appealed to the United States Supreme Court. Chief Justice John Marshall, Justice Joseph Story, and Justice Smith Thompson, agreed that the Massachusetts legislature had indeed violated the obligation of contract clause in Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution, but no final decision was reached. By the time the case came before the court again in 1837, a new Chief Justice, Roger Taney, had been appointed, and the Warren Bridge had been constructed and become a toll-free bridge, causing the Charles River Bridge to close. Daniel Webster and Warren Dutton represented the Charles River Bridge Company, while Simon Greenleaf, a Harvard Law School professor, and John Davis,a Whig senator, represented the Warren Bridge Company. A decision was read on February 14th, 1837, in favor of the Warren Bridge Company.
This collection contains the records of the 1828 Massachusetts Supreme Court trial between the proprietors of the Charles River Bridge and the proprietors of the Warren Bridge, including letters, motions, depositions, interrogatories, and other evidence. Among the exhibits presented as evidence are copies of documents dating from 1630, including records of the President and Fellows of Harvard College, The General Court of Massachusetts, the proprietors of the Charles River Bridge, and the Selectmen of Charlestown.
- Charles River Bridge (Mass.)
- Warren Bridge (Boston,Mass.)
- Charles River (Mass.) -- History
- Bridges -- Massachusetts -- Charles River
- Bridges-- Massachusetts -- Cambridge
- Bridges -- Massachusetts --Boston
- Ferries -- Massachusetts -- Boston
- Transportation -- Massachusetts -- Boston
- HarvardUniversity -- Finance
- Harvard College (1636-1780) --Finance -- 17th century -- Sources
- Harvard College(1636-1780) -- Finance -- 18th century -- Sources
- Eminentdomain -- United States -- Massachusetts
- Nathan Adams
- Joseph Austin
- Joseph Cutter,Jr.
- John Davis
- David Dodge
- Ebenezer Francis
- Stephen P. Fuller
- Stephen Gorham
- Francis C. Grey
- Samuel F.McCleary
- Samuel Payson
- Samuel Porter